Christmas-in-Pinner – Song and Video.

On Wednesday 26th November the Mayor of Harrow, Cllr Anjana Patel, switched on the Christmas Lights in Pinner High Street and they look splendid again this year.  This is an important landmark in the Pinner calendar and is something the local community certainly appreciates which is why the Pinner Association is pleased to fund these attractions every year.

This year, as well as carols and songs sung splendidly by choirs from Reddiford and West Lodge Schools, the event had a surprise addition.  The Mayor launched the Pinner Association’s seasonal song – Christmas In Pinner.   The song is on the Pinner Association Instagram and Facebook sites with a festive video of the event on Wednesday. 

If you do not use Instagram or Facebook you can hear the song and see the video using this link:-

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRmaCnhjvZc/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet

You can send the song and video to friends and family and / or post it on your social media.

 

Season’s Greetings from The Pinner Association.

 

To join The Pinner Association to help us to continue to support everyone in Pinner go to:

https://www.pinnerassociation.co.uk/membership/joinnow/

Concerts in The Park 27 July 2025

It’s Back! The moment you have been waiting for!  It should be dry tomorrow.

Harrow Steel will be opening our Concert in the Park season.

27 July @2:30pm, Pinner Memorial Park.

Bring a chair and a picnic. There will be a cash collection to help offset the cost of the concerts.

Concerts in the Park – Volunteers needed 2025

We are looking for volunteers to help with our annual band concerts.

If you are able to help please complete the form below.  Thank you

The concerts may not take place if there are severe weather warnings.

 

Notice of the 92nd AGM of The Pinner Association

Notice is hereby given under Rule 5 of the Pinner Association Constitution 2024 that the 92nd ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of THE PINNER ASSOCIATION (registered charity 262349) will be held at 8pm on Wednesday 16th April 2025 in the Pinner Village Hall, Chapel Lane, Pinner HA5 1AA.

The Agenda for the AGM will be:

  1. Minutes of the 91st AGM held on 17th April 2024 (as published on pages 76 to 78 of The Villager

No. 259 – July 2024 edition)

  1. Matters arising
  2. Chairman’s Report
  3. Treasurer’s Report and Accounts for the year ended 31st December 2024 (as published on pages 79 to 81 of The Villager No. 261 – March 2025 edition)
  4. Election of Officers and Committee
  5. Vote of thanks to and election of the Independent Examining Accountant for the current year
  6. Any other business

The Association welcomes nominations for Officers and the Committee. These must be made in writing (a completed PDF form submitted via email or on paper), supported by a seconder, having obtained the permission of the proposed nominee, and sent to the Chairman or Secretary (email below and postal address on page 3) at least one week before the AGM.

Any Pinner Association member who may be willing to stand for election is urged to contact either the Chairman or Secretary via email – [email protected] – to discuss how they may contribute to the work of the Association. Copies of the nomination forms for Officers and the Committee may be obtained via the same email address.

Our speaker will be Carole Furlong, the recently retired Director of Public Health for Harrow. If members have any questions on the topic of Public Health that they wish to be possibly addressed in her presentation, please submit them via email to [email protected] by Monday 31st March 2025.

UPDATE – Pinner Station Car Park

The following response has been submitted by The Pinner Association Executive Committee to J Sainsbury PLC following their less than satisfactory reply to our original complaint about the introduction of charges for parking at the Pinner Station Car Park which is managed by Euro Car Parks on behalf of Sainsbury’s – see previous correspondence in  “News” on this website:

Pinner Station Car Park – Pinner Association complaint about the changes to the parking fees and response from J Sainsbury PLC:

Our Committee has now had the opportunity to digest your reply of 10 June, and offer the following observations. Whilst we acknowledge that other Underground Station Car Parks in the vicinity charge at weekends, our older members have reminded us that free weekend parking was one of the promises made to our community to counter opposition to your company’s planning application for its new store. Scrutiny of your last accounts yields no pressing reason for you to change your original policy.  However, insult is added to injury when, as the result of no possibility of purchasing a weekly season ticket, plus the absence of any weekend reduction, the charge for a week’s parking is higher now than at any of the 11 Underground stations in the Borough of Harrow. At our two closest neighbouring stations, Eastcote and Rayners Lane, the cost of weekend parking is less than half that of the cost of parking in Pinner,  so fairness suggests that if an increase is necessary, which we would contest, any charge should not exceed that at neighbouring stations.

We are further informed by one of our members that the Car Park is virtually unavailable to disabled potential users because the lifts hardly ever work, and that, when they do, they are so filthy that they should bear a government health warning. We look forward, in the light of increased charges for this apology of a service, to expeditious repairs and deep cleaning.

Turning to implementation of the change, the experience of our members is far removed from your description of it. There was no information posted in the station on the new weekend charges, nor was there any information in your store or its car park that the ground level section of the Station Car Park, which had been open without any barrier or relevant signage for years to store customers, was about to become unavailable to them. Your contemptuous attitude to stakeholders is best exemplified by the fact that a conversation with our President in March was the first Information that TfL’s Director of Planning  knew of an increase implemented 4 months earlier.

You state that there was a period when warning letters were sent  rather than PCNs to those who did not pay either for weekend parking or for using the hitherto free ground level section of the Station Car Park. However, the letters were completely meaningless as they did not specify the nature of the “offence”.  One of our members, on receiving a warning letter from ECP, wrote in January asking what offence had been committed so that information could be cascaded to the community.  5 months later he is still awaiting the courtesy of a reply. The only inference we can draw from this is that, on your behalf, ECP was more interested in extorting unjustifiable penalties than in telling anybody what was going on. It was only some weeks after PCNs were issued and appeals started arriving, that a scruffy handwritten notice appeared in the Store Car Park, followed by a printed ECP one, and eventually, in March, a notice produced by the store near its entrance, presumably in response to complaints we know were made by customers.  ECP have also belatedly acknowledged their failures by cancelling some PCNs, but others were not cancelled despite being contested on essentially the same grounds.

This whole sorry episode has left a very nasty legacy in Pinner of hostility and resentment towards your company.  We continue, therefore to ask you both to remove or reduce the weekend charges for the Station Car Park, or at least introduce a weekly season ticket at a price comparable to nearby locations, and to cancel / repay those penalties levied on your customers whose offences were committed as a result of inadequate or non-existent communications on the part of your contractors or yourselves.  In the hope of a favourable response, we will resist the pressure we are under from our members to escalate the matter further into the public domain. 

Objection to installation of “temporary vehicle access” on the bend in Cuckoo Hill to allow access for the development of a part of the Tesco car park.

Objection submitted to Harrow Council Planning by The Pinner Association: 

Planning Application reference: PL/1276/24

Tesco, 1 Ash Hill Drive, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 2AG

Details pursuant to condition 5 (Construction Logistics Plan) attached to planning permission P/0719/22 allowed on appeal reference APP/M5450/W/23/3314704 dated 05/12/2023 for redevelopment to provide three storey building comprising 7 X 2 bed units and 1 X 1 bed unit; proposed vehicle access via supermarket to rear; parking; landscaping; bin and cycle stores; amenity space.

 

The Pinner Association has the following objection relating to this, and other “Approval of Details Reserved by Condition” compliance applications, for this proposed development.

A new dropped curb has been constructed on the bend in Cuckoo Hill where there is a granted on appeal to the Planning Inspectorate permission to construct flats in a portion of the Tesco car park at Pinner Green – appeal reference: APP/M5450/W/23/3314704.

There have recently been published on the Harrow Planning Portal several applications (references PL/0944/24, PL/1005/24 and PL/0970/24) from the developers to cover some of the conditions applied to this planning consent.   One of these shows that a “temporary access” from Cuckoo Hill is to be used during the construction of the development.

A “Construction Logistics Plan” application has now been published, Harrow Planning reference PL/1276/24, on the Harrow Planning Portal as was required as a condition of the grant of the appeal:

“21. The condition requiring a Detailed Construction Logistics Plan (DCLP) is necessary to mitigate risks to highway safety and impacts on neighbouring occupiers during construction. It is a pre-commencement condition because mitigation needs to be agreed before any works on site take place.”

This “Construction Logistics Plan” application Has made make it clear that during construction access to the site is proposed to be on the inside of the bend on Cuckoo Hill Road – see section 5 of the applicant’s “Construction and Logistics Plan” section 1.   This states that:

“Vehicular Site Access:

5.4: As mentioned in Paragraph 2.21, a temporary access will be established on Cuckoo Hill (at the northeastern corner of the site) for construction vehicles to enter and leave the site. This will avoid construction vehicles travelling through Ash Hill Drive and obstructing access to, from and within the Tesco Supermarket, which is expected to remain operational throughout the construction of the development.

5.5 Vehicles will drive into the site in forward gear and will then reverse out of the site onto Cuckoo Hill. As Cuckoo Hill will remain open throughout the works, construction vehicles will only be able to leave the site with the help of marshals who will temporarily hold traffic (using stop / go boards) on Cuckoo Hill (in both directions) and guide the vehicle out of the development.”

This would create a road safety hazard at the inside of a blind bend on a cambered incline which has been the site of many road traffic accidents in the past.  Cuckoo Hill is a busy route used by a steady stream of vehicles and stopping this traffic whilst a large vehicle was manoeuvred both in and out of the “temporary access” could result in severe congestion with a queue of vehicles affecting the exit on to Cuckoo Hill from roundabout at the junction with the A404 Rickmansworth Road.  The proposed use of the narrow section of Cuckoo Hill between the roundabout and the “temporary access”, where residents’ car parking effectively reduces the carriageway to one vehicle width, as the route for construction vehicles would again cause severe congestion and which block the roundabout exit and hence affect traffic flow on the A404 Rickmansworth Road .

During the consultation on the planning application for this development – reference P/0719/22 – the Pinner Association and many others objected to a vehicle access on the inside of the bend in Cuckoo Hill on the basis of road safety and as a result the applicants changed the proposed vehicular access to be via the Tesco car park and that is the basis upon which the application was allowed on appeal.

Even a “temporary access” on to Cuckoo Hill would create such a hazard to road safety that the other conditions compliance applications for this proposed development should be refused until a “Construction Logistics Plan” application which shows vehicular access to be via the Tesco car park during both construction and occupation of the new flats has been submitted and granted by Harrow Planning.

There would be a greater number of vehicle movements and by far bigger vehicles using the “temporary access” during construction that there would be during the occupation of the flats and therefore the potential road safety hazard of a vehicular access at that point would be even greater than that considered unacceptable when the planning application was modified to change the location of the vehicular access for the flats.

We are concerned that once the development is constructed the “temporary access” on to Cuckoo Hill could be become the de facto vehicular access for the new flats thus resulting in a permanent extreme hazard to road safety in Cuckoo Hill.

Contrary to the pre-commencement condition 21 of the allowed appeal:

“21. The condition requiring a Detailed Construction Logistics Plan (DCLP) is necessary to mitigate risks to highway safety and impacts on neighbouring occupiers during construction. It is a pre-commencement condition because mitigation needs to be agreed before any works on site take place.”

works have commenced on the site as the “temporary access” dropped curb on to Cuckoo Hill is already in place and the part of the Tesco car park to be used for this development has been fenced off.